Skip to main content
Menu

The National Portrait Gallery acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and recognises the continuing connection to lands, waters and communities. We pay our respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders both past and present.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander viewers are warned that this website contains images of deceased persons.

Glamour vs grunge

by Dr Christopher Chapman, 1 December 2010

Christopher Chapman examines the battle of glamour vs. grunge which played out in the fashion and advertising of the 1990s.

Megan Gale
Megan Gale, 2002 Ellen Dahl. © Ellen Dahl

Fashion and advertising in the 1990s set the slick against the slacker in the battle of glamour vs grunge.

Alternative culture in the 1990s was inflected by a sense of cynicism towards consumerism, a slacker aesthetic and a taste for grunge music and fashion, exemplified by Canadian writer Douglas Coupland’s popularisation of ‘Generation X’.

This cool disengagement was quickly picked up by the advertising industry in a kind of reverse psychology that said ‘We know you know the lifestyle we’re selling is fake.’ Classic teen rebellion mirrored a 1950s motif in poet-rockstar Kurt Cobain of the band Nirvana. Like James Dean, Cobain was sensitive and sexually ambiguous. They each embodied the awkward and intense feelings of their respective generations. Dean died in 1955 aged twenty-four crashing in his Porsche. Cobain used a shotgun to take his own life in 1994, he was twentyseven. Cobain and his fellow poets offered emotional rawness, inclusivity and acceptance of difference, with corresponding fashion cues including op-shop clothes, jeans and canvas shoes.

The 1990s grunge aesthetic was a strong contrast to an elevated glamour that was finely calibrated by American clothier Calvin Klein, exemplified by the purified, minimal, muscular body of youthful Mark Wahlberg wearing Calvin Klein underpants. Klein employed influential photographers Bruce Weber and Herb Ritts to create innovative images of contemporary beauty for billboards and magazines.

Calvin Klein’s ad campaigns celebrated idealised eroticism amid the cultural comprehension of HIV/AIDS. Philosophers and art historians debated the aesthetics of abjection and galleries presented exhibitions of grunge art. Millions were drawn to the escapism of Titanic, Jurassic Park and Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.

The National Portrait Gallery is displaying a suite of six photographs that feature prominent Australian personalities who reflect the glamour and grunge of the 1990s and early 2000s. The display includes some newly-acquired portraits including singer-songwriter Archie Roach by Bill McAuley and novelist Christos Tsiolkas by John Tsiavis. Megan Gale by Ellen Dahl and Nicole Kidman by Irving Penn are depicted in satiny-smooth silver tones; Kidman’s portrait evokes the glamour of classic Hollywood, Gale’s the clarity of contemporary Australian female beauty. Actor Noah Taylor has been photographed by Ross Honeysett dishevelled and emotionally exposed. In 2000 a young Australian actor by the name of Heath Ledger was shooting the movie A Knight’s Tale in Prague where he was photographed by Bruce Weber for Vanity Fair magazine. Weber captures Ledger comfortably tousled with a gentle smirk, boyish and warm. A bit glamour, a bit grunge.

3 portraits

1 Noah Taylor, 1994 (printed 2010) Ross Honeysett. © Ross Honeysett. 2 Archie Roach, 1992 (printed 2010) Bill McAuley. © Bill McAuley.
© National Portrait Gallery 2024
King Edward Terrace, Parkes
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia

Phone +61 2 6102 7000
ABN: 54 74 277 1196

The National Portrait Gallery acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and recognises the continuing connection to lands, waters and communities. We pay our respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present. We respectfully advise that this site includes works by, images of, names of, voices of and references to deceased people.

This website comprises and contains copyrighted materials and works. Copyright in all materials and/or works comprising or contained within this website remains with the National Portrait Gallery and other copyright owners as specified.

The National Portrait Gallery respects the artistic and intellectual property rights of others. The use of images of works of art reproduced on this website and all other content may be restricted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Requests for a reproduction of a work of art or other content can be made through a Reproduction request. For further information please contact NPG Copyright.

The National Portrait Gallery is an Australian Government Agency